artist of the day #40 Sanja Ivekovic

One of the common threads I see amongst the many goals a piece of art can have, is the intention to show the viewer something they didn’t see before. It might just be showing them something beautiful that they didn’t know existed, or it might be enlightening them to a new idea or perspective. The way this is accomplished has changed a lot over the years, especially in the last hundred years or so. Art has taken on a much broader agenda. Recently I came across a piece of art that challenged the understanding of a word, and did so in a very interesting way.

The word was “victory” and the artist was Sanja Ivekovic. She questioned Luxembourg’s understanding of this word and how they represented it through a statue. In Luxembourg they had a statue of the Gëlle Fra above a war memorial to honor those who served in WWII. The statue was supposed to represent the goddess Nike, who historically represents “victory.” Sanja Ivekovic disagreed with this symbolism. She thought the place to represent victory was not in conjoining with war, no matter how honorable the efforts and sacrifices might have been. She wanted to move the statue to be above a women’s shelter, located nearby. She made efforts to have this done, but in the end had to find another route, and she did. She created a replica of the statue, made her pregnant, and named her Rosa Luxemburg, after the Marxist philosopher who fought against socialist movements in Poland and Germany. This work was controversial but brought a lot of ideas and information to people who might not have thought twice about it otherwise. I can envision perhaps a family member of a soldier that died in WWII being offended by the work at first, but once they look more into the meaning of it and who Rosa Luxemburg was, I would like to think they see the need for understanding more than one kind of victory.

Sanja Ivekovic has gained a reputation for questioning preconceived notions in contemporary culture. She also has a large library of work questioning concepts of celebrity, vanity, and sexuality. She often juxtaposes concepts from advertisements with more serious issues like the mistreatment of women across the planet. She grew up in the region of the former Yugoslavia which is reflected in much of her work, speaking out against socialism and the way her country was run under Josip Broz Tito.

To learn more about Ivekovic you can see the current retrospective of her work at the MoMA, or at least check out the website they have created with nice descriptions of each of her series of works: http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2011/sanjaivekovic/

artist of the day #39: Freegums

What is black and white and seems to never stop? Well aside from a zebra running from a white tiger on a mobius strip, it is the art of the Peruvian artist who goes by the moniker Freegums. His real name is Alvaro Ilizarbe and he is based out of Miami, Fl. Although he has very little formal education in the arts (less than a year at the Art Institute of Ft. Lauderdale) he has managed to really get his name out there. He has had his work represented all over the United States, in Canada, and Thailand. Many of his projects have been collaborative efforts with other “street” artists who share some of his sensibilities. His reputation even caught the attention of Nike Shoes, so they let him design a pair of sneakers.

The work of Freegums is sort of one part op-art, one part street art, one part tribal art, and one part pop-art. He works almost entirely in stark black and white. He is probably most well known for his anamorphic line patterns. With these he has done several different things. At times he will take a random piece of scrap wood and fill it with these designs. Other times he will fit these patterns into an infinite design and create wallpaper, which he will use to cover an entire room. Then he likes to use this room to display his wooden pieces so it becomes difficult to tell where the room starts and the pieces of art begin. In other pieces he seems to be very inspired by indigenous art styles including Native-American and his own Peruvian background. These works often include various kinds of mythical creatures that weave in and out of each other, again often creating an infinite pattern. Although he sometimes works on a smaller scale with individual pieces, it is safe to say that his work is best represented when it is all encompassing and huge.

Judging by his website, he is also very inspired by and interested in music, specifically that of house dance music. He has several videos featuring very intense beat patterns that could be seen as an audio version of his own painting style. These videos also feature footage of him dancing with seemingly random backgrounds. If nothing else it proves that he doesn’t take himself too seriously and likes to have a good time.

 

 

http://freegums.com/

artist of the day #38: P7

Sometimes things in life make a full-circle, other times things can make anamorphic loops that cover some familiar ground. I met this chick, Bethany Brown as a Peace Corps volunteer in Thailand. She is on my list of people that get these “Artist of the Day” posts because she is cool. She has recommended that I check out several artists that I have found very interesting. Recently, she recommended I check out a particular blog at http://thetouristzine.tumblr.com/ . On this blog there was a recent artist discussed who goes by the name Freegums. When checking out this guy I came across a collaborative project he did in guess where, Thailand. And one of the artists he works with is someone whose work I have seen 100 times in Thailand, but could never get more info on because he doesn’t take credit for most of his work, but now I know him as P7. So today I will talk about P7, because it is long over due that I dig up more info on this guy, and tomorrow I hope to get to Mr. Freegums.

I will start off by saying I might have some biased feelings towards this artist because I have had a glimpse at the culture he comes from, and I have learned to really appreciate a mind like his coming from a place like Thailand. As much as I have learned to appreciate my time in Thailand, it is a place where an artist is very much pushed to be more of a professional crafts(wo)man. So in a place like Brooklyn where I am at now, where it seems like everyone and their cousin is some sort of a graffiti artist, but in Thailand, it’s a bit more rare. To put it into proper analogies, it would be like seeing a Buddhist monk walking down your street here in the US and asking for donations of food. And to be clear, when I say graffiti artist, I mean artist, not someone who scribbles a name on the back of a stop sign, I mean someone who forces thoughts into your head because of the brilliance and talent of their publicly created piece of art.

P7 is based in Bangkok but works all over Thailand and beyond. Almost as important as what he does is where he does it. He likes to pick places not normally found fit for contemporary art. He feels that the older the wall he paints on, the better. He seems to have a dark sense of humor with thematic influences ranging from cartoons to classic novels. His work is often playful and disturbing at the same time. In some works he is replicating reality at an intimidating level but in most he is playing with the childlike nature of cartoon like shapes, colors, and figures. Through gaining a reputation of beautifying some of the less attractive walls in Thailand, he has gained the right to illustrate some of the most sought after. He has become almost an in-house artist at the best place in the country to see contemporary art, the Bangkok Art and Cultural Center. He has participated in several of the collaborative murals in the building and he designed the playful Tiger-head sculptures out front (I think they’re still there?).

One thing that I really like about him is his ability to collaborate. Perhaps it comes from the more community minded culture of Thailand, or maybe it is just him, but it really seems like P7 has found ways to work with lots of different kinds of people from all over the planet. Born and bred in Bangkok, he has shown his work internationally as well. He is a part of an important slice of the next generation in Thailand, he questions what is being taught to him, and is not about to follow tradition blindly. If you are in Thailand and have an open mind or a blank wall, he will probably fill one of them if not both.

Whitney Chen is coming to Lehigh!

We wrote about one of our favorite TV chefs this summer when alumni Whitney Chen appeared on the FoodTV network competition, “The Next FoodTV Star” this past summer. We have some really fantastic news to share with our readers….

(brace yourself)

Lehigh’s very own Whitney Chen ’05 is coming back to campus to share her story of following her passion. She’ll even be doing a food demo that EVERYONE can see. Of course, since everyone will want to see her, your chance to secure a place in the room is RIGHT NOW on this very link.

She will discuss her journey from energy consultant to Three Michelin Star line-chef to food editor and writer and how she’s used her IE degree to get her from one career to the next.  The Next Food Network Star contestant will be demonstrating some of her favorite meals perfect for cooking at college!  Recipes will be provided for all attendees.

More about Whitney Chen -> she graduated from Lehigh with her degree in Industrial Engineering in 2005. She worked in New York City as a former engineering consultant for four years, then quit her job and received a culinary certificate from L’Academie de Cuisine in Bethesda, Md. She worked her way up the culinary ladder to the line at a Three Michelin Star restaurant in New York City.

A serious home cook turned professional chef; Whitney enjoys using the freshest seasonal ingredients in her cooking and believes that anyone can incorporate advanced techniques into making everyday meals that impress. Whitney came in fifth place in season seven of The Next Food Network Star. Whitney also writes for the Hinsdale-CalendonHills Patch.com; some great recipes here to try .

Bethlehem Restaurant Week is coming!!!!

Is that your stomach growling? Then, we begin with an apology for the torture of this post which is all about food.

Have you ever made a really, really good meal? Have you ever played with food? Have you ever tried to impress your date with your culinary genius? Do you watch cooking shows? Or do you just like to be impressed with the skills of an expert cook, or seasoned chef? If you’ve answered, “yes” to any of these questions, we encourage you to check out Bethlehem’s Restaurant Week. If you do, make plans for some great meals – and go easy on the grocery list this week.

Presented by the Downtown Bethlehem Association, this week-long event features 32 (that’s right – THIRTY TWO) restaurants offering fixed menues for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

  • Breakfast price points: $5, $10
  • Lunch price points: $5, $10, $15
  • Dinner price points: $10, $20, $25, $30, $35
No passes, tickets or coupons are required. Instead, diners may simply visit their favorite participating restaurants throughout the week to enjoy the special prix fixe breakfast, lunch or dinner menus. It is strongly recommended that diners make reservations in advance. To make reservations, diners should contact the restaurants directly. This is your chance to revisit a favorite restaurant, or try a new destination. Most of the restaurants are within a reasonable walking distance from campus; some in South Bethlehem, some in Historic North Bethlehem.

For a list of participating restaurants, check out this website. Or enlarge the image you see here.

But wait, there’s more! There is also a contest during Restaurant Week. You could win $2,000 of gift certificates from the participating restaurants. Each time you dine on a restaurant week menu, the server will hand you a contest slip. You can fill in up to three contest slips a day – a total of 21 entries for the week. More Restaurant Week contest details and rules here.

As one of our favorite foodies likes to say, “We bid you, good eating!” (~Alton Brown)

artist of the day #37: Jan Vormann

Did you ever hurt yourself as a child, and your parents tried to make you feel better by giving you a toy? I think that is sort of what Jan Vormann is doing, except the bruised knee belongs to his surrounding world. Although his medium of choice is quite varied, I came to know him through his use of toys to fix the wear and tear of the world around him. Perhaps the thing he has gotten to be known for most is his use of Legos to replace missing bricks and repair damaged walls. Jan will simply walk around any given street with a bag of Legos and some strong adhesive to fill in a gap he feels needs some color. In more than one place he was asked to do a permanent installation by city officials. He encourages public interaction and loves it when people just spontaneously help him out.

He has also taken this same approach of repair to some found objects. He has taken several damaged trophies and sculptures and repaired them with parts from found toys. This takes something that would have been otherwise discarded and then redefines it through rebirth.

If I were to sum up his approach, I would say more than anything he is simply trying to remind us of the wonder inside a child’s mind. He wants to remind us of the magic that a toy can bring into our mind. He is serious about trying to be funny.

Vormann also does some other series of works, but it was his interaction of toys that introduced me to him. He has created a series of kinetic sculptures that also tend to have a sense of humor to them, although an often darker one. He created a small collection of animal cages that also double as suicide machines in case the animal rather die than be held captive. (Check the video links) Other kinetic sculptures offer a different kind of sand hour-glass. In some works the choice of media is the central theme, in others it is completely irrelevant. Even though I came to know his kind of as the “Lego Guy” I hope that is not the reputation he continues to hold. I think his work only gets more interesting the more you look into it.

http://www.janvormann.com/kinetic-objects/simple-suicidal-systems/rat/

http://www.janvormann.com/kinetic-objects/simple-suicidal-systems/fox/

http://www.janvormann.com/kinetic-objects/simple-suicidal-systems/parrot/

artist of the (day) #36: Riusuke Fukahori

When describing art, many people have said something along the lines of art being a mirror to everything that happens in the world, it is a reflection of our everyday lives. But how often is art mistaken for life? When I first came across the work of Riusuke Fukaori, my first assumption was that It was just some fairly boring photography. Then I came across the word “resin” and expected to see something about PETA protesting his work because I assumed he was freezing live goldfish in resin. Not until I saw the video about his process did I believe that his work was entirely man made, in fact I still find it difficult to fathom. I would really like to see this work in person.

His work is also difficult to classify in some ways. Is he a sculptor, or a painter? He seems to be a little of both, in very unique ways. He creates these optical illusions with layers upon layers of paint in between thin layers of resin. So his process is entirely painterly, but the end product is purely sculptural. I have seen other artists play with the layering of resin iwith some attempt at creating an optical illusion, but never has the magic been so seamless.

There is part of me that would like to see him take this same skill and patience toward creating something stranger or more complex then just goldfish, but perhaps the goldfish is what makes this work so well. He takes the most common pet on the planet, a creature given away at carnivals, and sold for nickels, and makes an absolutely gorgeous piece of art about it. Simple, but beautiful, Fukaori is the champion of the goldfish.

artist of the (day) #35: Ron Mueck

Everyone likes a cute baby. What about when it’s 20 feet tall? And of course we all look up to our fathers. But would your impression change if he was 1/3 the size? And I know I’ve heard pregnant women say they feel like they’ve quadrupled in size. What happens when they actually do? Find a glimpse into questions like these through the fascinating work of hyper-realist sculptor Ron Mueck.

Mueck takes his ability to create a super realistic human sculpture and twists it quite powerfully with the concept of scale. I wouldn’t have guessed that just playing with one element in an artwork could change it so radically, but his work proves otherwise. My first reaction is somewhat off putting, most likely out of a feeling of pure displacement. After a minute or two I can start to see deeper concepts. Like there is something very empowering about a pregnant woman who is about 18 feet tall. Perhaps a giant baby represents how large it feels in the confines of your daily life. And I know personally that every time I have been to an open casket viewing, the body seems smaller than I remember it. So I think Mueck is trying to exaggerate that sensation. At the very very least, he is making a special effort at grabbing your attention. I know I have had days when I am trying to get as much art viewing in as possible, and I am practically racing through galleries and museums, only stopping to look at what catches my eyes. This work would definitely stop me in my path.

Ron Mueck started his career by making and operating puppets on an Australian kid’s show. At one point he even worked with Jim Henson on the movie The Labyrinth in which he designed and voiced Ludo. He then gained some work creating animatronic sculptures for various advertisements, but always felt some sort of dissatisfaction that the pieces only looked good from a specific angle. After some years he decided to try his hand at fine art where he could try to get passed this challenge. He first gained attention with his piece Dead Dad and begin to exhibit all over the world shortly after.

I have never seen his work in person so I am left to imagine their presence through photos. This creates an interesting perspective, where I need to find photos with spectators in them to give me an ideal of scale. In this the viewers become part of my experience of the work, and one can not easily say where the work ends and the rest of the world area begins.

Fambul Tok

Fambul Tok

Click for website

Sierra Leone suffered a brutal civil war that started in 1991 and lasted 11 years. The end of the war has ushered in a period of recovery and rebuilding in the country. Its citizens have struggled with issues of forgiveness and reconciliation.

Sierra Leoneans have revived the traditional practice of fambul tok, which translates to “family talk”. Communities have come together for programs of truth-telling and forgiveness ceremonies. The country is building sustainable peace at the grass-roots level and succeeding where the international community’s post-conflict efforts failed.

The Southside Film Institute is screening a documentary that chronicles the process of forgiveness and reconciliation in post-conflict Sierra Leone. Fambul Tok tells the story of healing through the intimate stories of perpetrators and victims.

The film has powerful lessons about how to end the cycle of violence. These lessons can be applied in our families, in our communities, and in our nations.

.

Location: Victory Fire House

Address: 205 Webster Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015

Date: January 19, 2012

Time: Doors open at 6:45pm – Film starts at 7:15pm

Admission: Free

artist(s) of the day: Jeff Koons and Damien Hirst

today’s entry comes from a friend of mine. not sure whether or not he meant for me to take it in this direction, but he sent me the following thoughts, and being that I didn’t get around to writing about any particular artists today, it seems fitting to me. I told him I wouldn’t give him any credit and I would only mock all of his ancestors, but what can I say, I’m a sweet guy. Enjoy these thoughts from my good friend John Spinella

______________________________________________________________________________________

Since the Artist of the Day seems to center on living artist, there are two current superstars of the contemporary art world that I have an extremely ambivalent relationship with – Jeff Koons and Damien Hirst.  In some senses I almost hate them, but I can’t stop paying attention to them.  What does this say about them?  To be fair, “hate” is a strong word, and said hatred is more pointed toward Mr. Hirst, specifically for moral reasons.  Anyone could easily say that both of these artists challenge the philosophy of what makes art, well, art.  But, personally, I don’t think that, most of the time, that’s what they’re even trying to do.

Koons is easier to enjoy.  Or, at least, pay attention to without too much frustration.  I’d say he’s most famous for his metallic sculptures that look like balloon animals (and most infamous for his series of pornographic images of him fucking his then-wife/Hungarian porn star).  He claims his work has absolutely no meaning whatsoever, that it’s essentially pop art.  Now this doesn’t necessarily mean that they really don’t, as plenty of artists through time have stated such things and were full of shit (I always think of filmmakers like Fritz Lang and John Ford when I hear statements like this, who said such things all the time).  But, if you want to take him for his word, then observing his art is simply left to centralized visual stimulation and, of course, the quality and merit of its craft.  Regarding craft, his work is undeniably excellent – those balloon animals really do look like balloon animals, despite the fact that they’re made of metal.  But here’s something that will throw you off – his works are made by studio workshops.  There are pieces of his that Koons himself has said he never created a single inch of.  Now, workshops have been around since the Renaissance, but justly for more logical reasons back then.  Michelangelo had his own workshop of fellow artists help him complete the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, but, realistically, if he had painted that ceiling solo it would’ve taken an entire lifetime (even with an full team it took him 4 years).  Koons comes up with an idea and has someone else execute it.  He states his art has no meaning, so then what value do these “ideas” of his hold?  As I stated before, pop art is solely about cosmetic aesthetics, and I have no problem with this fact.  Such aesthetics can stimulate the mind endlessly.  But if you’re not even the craftsman created the craft, what are you?
My beef with Damien Hirst (probably best known for his platinum coated human skull covered with diamonds), on the other hand, regards morals rather than intellectual argumentatives.  I’ll get to the point: the man kills animals to make his art, and this really does anger me.  For one of his pieces, he killed a shark, suspended it in a tank, and said “Ta-dah!  It’s art!”.  To all the haters he simply gave the childish argument, “Well, you didn’t think of it.”  He didn’t kill the shark himself either.  Rather, he hired a fisherman to go out, kill one, and bring it back to him.  Perhaps he could have used some symbolic mumbo-jumbo of his struggles of going out and conquering the animal, but unfortunately he was just sitting comfortably at home while someone else took care of the dirty work.  To make matters worse, he did it twice.  The original started falling apart (for obvious reasons), so he had a second shark killed.  The work was displayed at the Met for many years, and had only recently disappeared the last time I went to see you.  Like Koons, he constantly challenges viewers to wonder what makes art art, which is something I like (and is why Marcel Duchamp is my favorite 20th century artist – he pioneered such ideas).  But unfortunately I don’t think he does this consciously.  I think he shares a common quality with the art snobs of the world – he, along with them, think that something he made is art just because he made it.  This idea was challenged with his dead shark piece – a fishing shop had a dead shark that they had caught displayed in their front window, and it was there long before Hirst had created his own piece.  Their question was: how come his is art and ours isn’t?  Simply because he said his was?  It’s a good question.

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.